Mazda CX-5 The CX-5 CUV debuts Mazda's SKYACTIV® TECHNOLOGY and is unique for its impressive fuel economy, responsive handling and bold style

2019 CX-5 Turbo Recommended Fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-13-2019, 09:08 PM
firefox111's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 121
Default 2019 CX-5 Turbo Recommended Fuel

I referred to the Owners Manual of my 2019 CX-5 GTR (Turbo) and I couldn't find the recommended fuel grade in the Specifications section of the book. And it is not marked on the fuel filler door. I have been filling her up with 87 octane and 88 octane in New Mexico. I had not noticed any issue with the 87 octane and I'm happy with the performance so I will continue to use it. I know I gain mpg and performance with the higher grade but there's a cost difference and it adds up throughout the years. I'm retired so I'm careful with my expenses.
 
  #2  
Old 10-13-2019, 09:30 PM
shipo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: southern New Hampshire
Posts: 2,726
Default

Originally Posted by firefox111
I referred to the Owners Manual of my 2019 CX-5 GTR (Turbo) and I couldn't find the recommended fuel grade in the Specifications section of the book. And it is not marked on the fuel filler door. I have been filling her up with 87 octane and 88 octane in New Mexico. I had not noticed any issue with the 87 octane and I'm happy with the performance so I will continue to use it. I know I gain mpg and performance with the higher grade but there's a cost difference and it adds up throughout the years. I'm retired so I'm careful with my expenses.
Technically speaking, regular fuel has a bit more power per gallon than premium; all else being equal, regular will return better fuel economy. That said, all else is rarely equal; if you are consistently pushing the power envelope, then premium will typically give better fuel economy on a turbocharged engine, however, if you are driving across the flat Great Plains, then regular will have a slight advantage. Regarding New Mexico, it all depends, are you booking it up some steep grades with a heavily loaded car, or are you in some of the flatter areas?
 
  #3  
Old 10-13-2019, 10:22 PM
firefox111's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by shipo
Technically speaking, regular fuel has a bit more power per gallon than premium; all else being equal, regular will return better fuel economy. That said, all else is rarely equal; if you are consistently pushing the power envelope, then premium will typically give better fuel economy on a turbocharged engine, however, if you are driving across the flat Great Plains, then regular will have a slight advantage. Regarding New Mexico, it all depends, are you booking it up some steep grades with a heavily loaded car, or are you in some of the flatter areas?
I-40 in NM to AZ. Santa Rosa, ABQ, to Gallup, then to Arizona. 87 is currently $2.77 compared to $3.79 for premium. I’ll continue using 87 regular but I will not fill up with 86 in NM. I think 86 is only for Northern NM. CO too has 86 for their lowest grade.
 
  #4  
Old 10-13-2019, 10:28 PM
khaug1's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 10
Default

Mazda's web site says the CX-5's turbo engine can run on 87 octane fuel, but using 93 octane will give you an additional 23 horsepower (and should yield slightly lower fuel consumption, IMO),

FWIW, I use Shell 93 octane premium exclusively. Premium fuels typically have superior additive packages, which should keep the injectors and intake valves a little cleaner as well.

-K.
 
  #5  
Old 10-14-2019, 07:17 AM
shipo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: southern New Hampshire
Posts: 2,726
Default

Originally Posted by khaug1
FWIW, I use Shell 93 octane premium exclusively. Premium fuels typically have superior additive packages, which should keep the injectors and intake valves a little cleaner as well.
Marketing bilge, I've been elbow deep in many-many engines which have been run on fuel ranging from the top of the Top-Tier on through bargain basement no-name brands and have yet to see any difference in the cleanliness of the injectors or the intake valves. FWIW, I believe all CX-5 engines are considered direct injection engines, and if I have that correct, no fuel in the world will keep the intake valves clean.
 
  #6  
Old 10-15-2019, 09:40 AM
firefox111's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by shipo
Marketing bilge, I've been elbow deep in many-many engines which have been run on fuel ranging from the top of the Top-Tier on through bargain basement no-name brands and have yet to see any difference in the cleanliness of the injectors or the intake valves. FWIW, I believe all CX-5 engines are considered direct injection engines, and if I have that correct, no fuel in the world will keep the intake valves clean.
Amen to that. I will continue to fill her up with 87. I have proven this on I-44 in MO that the 87 octane gives plenty of power to negotiate the long inclines in MO. But in New Mexico and Colorado, their lowest grade is 86 so I fill her up with 88, their mid-grade.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Trayflipcrook
Mazda CX-5
20
03-10-2020 06:51 AM
firefox111
Mazda CX-5
5
10-14-2019 08:53 PM
firefox111
Mazda CX-5
7
07-11-2019 07:49 PM
MrBillMazda
Mazda CX-5
48
11-18-2018 06:07 AM
autopal
Mazda CX-5
1
04-30-2018 07:14 PM



Quick Reply: 2019 CX-5 Turbo Recommended Fuel



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.