Cx5 or cx50 2023?
#11
The CX5 is built in Japan ,it has an independent rear suspension . The CX50 is built in America has more interior volume ,beam real suspension and better ground clearance , but IMHO the quality control and ride and handling of the CX5 is better . Drive both back to back on the same day and decide for yourself . The CX5 has been in production longer ,and is more likely to be sorted out and have fewer bugs/teething pains than the new CX50 in it's first year of production.
Drive em both indeed - But I personally have always been skeptical of 1st & 2nd - year cars
- but again - the CX-50 is fundsmentally similar - to the 5 - the rear suspension detail , I was not aware of and is in my opinion the difference between a vehicle aimed at superior handling vs one thats built with towing in mind - If you have prime fire stick - theres several lengthy (u-tube) videos of the CX-5 being built in Japan and follows the process from raw steel to finished product- I found them to be informative - but mazda does not reveal all the build stages for what I believe are profuction and build secrets not shown to the public -just as at the plants - many areas are off limits with guards stsnding by in case anyone gets motivated to try and sneak into a no access area - these videos are likely the same as (u-tube ) online /-
#12
I've always avoided the first year of a new vehicle with any brand. Manufacturers learn a lot from those first year customers and year 2 tends to be a much better vehicle. The same attitude also on any model that goes through a generational update.
I watched a video of a Japanese automobile engineer who did a comparison of a Japanese built Toyota Rav4 vs a North American built model. Both were very good quality in the opinion of the engineer, but in a side by side visual comparison of fit and finish of the exterior and interior, he showed the Japanese built model showed a better quality of work. My new CX-5 is probably the best fit and finished auto that I've ever bought new.
I watched a video of a Japanese automobile engineer who did a comparison of a Japanese built Toyota Rav4 vs a North American built model. Both were very good quality in the opinion of the engineer, but in a side by side visual comparison of fit and finish of the exterior and interior, he showed the Japanese built model showed a better quality of work. My new CX-5 is probably the best fit and finished auto that I've ever bought new.
#13
I've always avoided the first year of a new vehicle with any brand. Manufacturers learn a lot from those first year customers and year 2 tends to be a much better vehicle. The same attitude also on any model that goes through a generational update.
I watched a video of a Japanese automobile engineer who did a comparison of a Japanese built Toyota Rav4 vs a North American built model. Both were very good quality in the opinion of the engineer, but in a side by side visual comparison of fit and finish of the exterior and interior, he showed the Japanese built model showed a better quality of work. My new CX-5 is probably the best fit and finished auto that I've ever bought new.
I watched a video of a Japanese automobile engineer who did a comparison of a Japanese built Toyota Rav4 vs a North American built model. Both were very good quality in the opinion of the engineer, but in a side by side visual comparison of fit and finish of the exterior and interior, he showed the Japanese built model showed a better quality of work. My new CX-5 is probably the best fit and finished auto that I've ever bought new.
#14
I tested drive both and I like much more the driving sensation of cx5, so I just went for it. Felt lighter, more agile. I didn't liked the stearing wheel of cx50, I pushed a little bit in corners and felt too heavy too. I guess wagon cars is not for me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post