Mazda3 Offered in both a sedan and wagon, this sporty model offers a great car for the family, as well a fun track car.

2014 real gas mpg vs. computer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-20-2014 | 06:10 PM
timmonsr@gmail.com's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 68
Default 2014 real gas mpg vs. computer

Could people post what they get in real gas mileage vs. what the computer says? On a mostly highway trip yesterday, computer said 39.7 mpg and real number was 38.2 mpg. So the computer was optimistic by 1.5 mpg.
 
  #2  
Old 02-20-2014 | 08:19 PM
leftoverture's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 32
From: Birdtown, MN
Default

Wow. That's pretty good mileage whichever way you look at it. Our 2010 gets only about 21-22 in town and about 30-31 on the highway.
 
  #3  
Old 02-22-2014 | 11:03 AM
knucklehead11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 298
From: Austin, TX
Default

I never trust the computer readout. I did have one moment where it was EXACTLY what I got. I couldn't believe it! I haven't been tracking it much but since this last fill up I am to see where I'm at now that I've put almost 10,000 miles on it and I'd say it's nice and broken in now
 
  #4  
Old 02-23-2014 | 10:18 AM
virgin1's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,666
From: Manor, TX (Outside of Austin)
Default


Trip computers are never that accurate. I've never seen one that was less than 1 - 1.5 mpg to the good. They are usually thinking optimistically and I wouldn't trust them.
The old ones worked primarily with the engine manifold vacuum, reading it to determine where the throttle was and working with a set of pre-determined parameters (mathematics.) The newer ones take readings from all the sensors, but still use some engineers idea of how to interpret the info. It's not real world, but an estimate at best.
For accuracy do it the old-fashioned way. It's as accurate as you can get.
 
  #5  
Old 02-24-2014 | 11:39 AM
timmonsr@gmail.com's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 68
Default

I would think that they now use signals sent to the fuel injection - but still don't expect them to be accurate. Even using the numbers on the pump and tripometer, need to consider difference between pumps nozzle shut off settings and mileage errors.


But I don't think I will ever see the EPA 40 mpg rating of my car, unless it is down hill from the mountains. The 2014 sure does coast good.
 
  #6  
Old 02-24-2014 | 02:02 PM
virgin1's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,666
From: Manor, TX (Outside of Austin)
Default


Yes, I agree, Timmons, so all we can do is the best we can do. But I find if I use the same station, same pump and fill up at roughly the same time of day consistently, and assuming no funny business with off-sized tires, that my mileage is also consistent using the numbers/calculation method.
I was once running 215/50 instead of the factory 205/50 sized tires and had the conversion figured out so I could adjust for the size difference every time.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlauson
Mazda CX-9
1
09-14-2015 12:28 PM
SPL Tech
Mazda CX-5
3
11-05-2014 07:21 PM
UseYourNoggin
Off Topic
0
05-24-2013 09:58 AM
alps31985
Mazda6
5
02-20-2011 06:12 PM
piper
Mazda6
1
02-15-2009 12:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.