Gains from a header
#1
Gains from a header
Heyz pipl,
I have been searching this forum to find some info on the performance gains from sport headers (ones that keep the cat in place). I failed to find any
Can you tell me how much an OBX or a similar header adds? Are there any rattling, hissing, melting, cracking, etc issues attached tot hose headers?
Finally, are there any good quality intake manifold gaskets? I bought one for $20 and installed it myself on the car. Best value mod of all time, during the winter
Thanks.
I have been searching this forum to find some info on the performance gains from sport headers (ones that keep the cat in place). I failed to find any
Can you tell me how much an OBX or a similar header adds? Are there any rattling, hissing, melting, cracking, etc issues attached tot hose headers?
Finally, are there any good quality intake manifold gaskets? I bought one for $20 and installed it myself on the car. Best value mod of all time, during the winter
Thanks.
#2
Heyz pipl,
I have been searching this forum to find some info on the performance gains from sport headers (ones that keep the cat in place). I failed to find any
Can you tell me how much an OBX or a similar header adds? Are there any rattling, hissing, melting, cracking, etc issues attached tot hose headers?
Finally, are there any good quality intake manifold gaskets? I bought one for $20 and installed it myself on the car. Best value mod of all time, during the winter
Thanks.
I have been searching this forum to find some info on the performance gains from sport headers (ones that keep the cat in place). I failed to find any
Can you tell me how much an OBX or a similar header adds? Are there any rattling, hissing, melting, cracking, etc issues attached tot hose headers?
Finally, are there any good quality intake manifold gaskets? I bought one for $20 and installed it myself on the car. Best value mod of all time, during the winter
Thanks.
#4
How can this be? Simple, valve overlap actually requires some back pressure to achieve maximum volumetric efficiency; reducing the back pressure without a corresponding change up stream may (and often will) yield results contrary to what was intended.
#5
Quite correct. Those new self learning ECU's can do minor adjustments and remappings on their own to accomodate the new mods. However their range is limited and they do not deviate far from the factory specs. Therefore the gains are less than half of what they would have been with a proper tune.
The argument of backpressure is semi obsolete. Thanks to the new ECU's, the cars do not lose AS much low end torque as they used to in the old days. Also, the simple addition of the header would preserve a plenty of backpressure from the cat and the catback exhaust. Finally, I am looking for mid-upper end power. If I wanted more TQ, I would have probably gone with a lightweight pulley. Those things rule!
The argument of backpressure is semi obsolete. Thanks to the new ECU's, the cars do not lose AS much low end torque as they used to in the old days. Also, the simple addition of the header would preserve a plenty of backpressure from the cat and the catback exhaust. Finally, I am looking for mid-upper end power. If I wanted more TQ, I would have probably gone with a lightweight pulley. Those things rule!
#6
Quite correct. Those new self learning ECU's can do minor adjustments and remappings on their own to accomodate the new mods. However their range is limited and they do not deviate far from the factory specs. Therefore the gains are less than half of what they would have been with a proper tune.
The argument of backpressure is semi obsolete. Thanks to the new ECU's, the cars do not lose AS much low end torque as they used to in the old days. Also, the simple addition of the header would preserve a plenty of backpressure from the cat and the catback exhaust. Finally, I am looking for mid-upper end power. If I wanted more TQ, I would have probably gone with a lightweight pulley. Those things rule!
The argument of backpressure is semi obsolete. Thanks to the new ECU's, the cars do not lose AS much low end torque as they used to in the old days. Also, the simple addition of the header would preserve a plenty of backpressure from the cat and the catback exhaust. Finally, I am looking for mid-upper end power. If I wanted more TQ, I would have probably gone with a lightweight pulley. Those things rule!
#8
I gave you a plain answer in my first response to you; you're will not gain much of anything. Apparently you know better though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chartoo
Mazda 323,Mazda 626 & Mazda 929
1
05-20-2006 09:46 PM