highest MPG you obtained in your mazda 3
#22
On the Tailgating, when much younger and moving across country, while I was talking to the driver on the CB since I was close enough that I was hitting the brakes to avoid being sucked into the back of his trailer. I went from Lincoln Nebraska to Wiggens Colorado, at pretty close to 420 miles in a 1972 Ranchero getting close to 30 MPG.
I Don't tailgate now, trusting your own vehicles safety is 1 thing, but trusting the other vehicle is totally different.
I Don't tailgate now, trusting your own vehicles safety is 1 thing, but trusting the other vehicle is totally different.
Ya' have to get mighty close in order for that to work properly though, too close really, and I would/could not recommend doing it.
#23
All vehicles create a low pressure area behind and under them, the bigger the vehicle the bigger the low pressure area. So if you get close enough it will suck you up to it actually making your motor coast or run with less fuel to keep your own mass moving.
#24
I also tried it several times when younger, but on much shorter distances. You have grown wise, young one. Tailgating is the last thing you want to do... especially these days when driver's are so much more unpredictable.
Several things, really. First, the trailer will create a huge hole and you are cutting the wind resistance as you suggest. But in addition, the tall, flat nature of the trailer creates a huge vortex (negative pressure) right behind it which helps pull your car forward doubling the effect. If your car feels like it's being tossed around, you ain't close enough and are caught in the roosters tail.
Ya' have to get mighty close in order for that to work properly though, too close really, and I would/could not recommend doing it.
Several things, really. First, the trailer will create a huge hole and you are cutting the wind resistance as you suggest. But in addition, the tall, flat nature of the trailer creates a huge vortex (negative pressure) right behind it which helps pull your car forward doubling the effect. If your car feels like it's being tossed around, you ain't close enough and are caught in the roosters tail.
Ya' have to get mighty close in order for that to work properly though, too close really, and I would/could not recommend doing it.
#25
k&n airfilter + premium gas = better mileage
yes/no
#26
But i don't think so with my personal experience i used the Plus fuel and i get more mileage. I have been using the plus fuel for the past 2 years since i brought the car. What do other people experience or think about this?
k&n airfilter + premium gas = better mileage
yes/no
k&n airfilter + premium gas = better mileage
yes/no
As for Premium fuel, unless your engine is built to take advantage of the extra detonation resistance (i.e. high mechanical compression ratio and/or the ability to advance the ignition timing to keep the combustion wave at the ragged edge of insipient detonation) there is no physical possibility for Premium fuel to give you better mileage, and if anything, your mileage may actually go down.
#27
But i don't think so with my personal experience i used the Plus fuel and i get more mileage. I have been using the plus fuel for the past 2 years since i brought the car. What do other people experience or think about this?
k&n airfilter + premium gas = better mileage
yes/no
k&n airfilter + premium gas = better mileage
yes/no
Here are my experiences and what I've done:
1) Installed a K&N panel around 7-8k miles. No difference.
2) Monzta timing mod around this time too. (It adds about 4* advance.) No difference.
3) +/-10k miles. Modified the stock airbox. Kept the K&N panel. Still no difference.
4) Converted to full synthetic oils (first Mobil1, now Castrol) in both the engine and the trans. No difference.
4) Removed the stock airbox and install a Mazdaspeed/AEM CAI @ roughly 30k miles. No difference.
In addition, I have tried tanks of straight 93, 89 oct, and various mixes, as well as running a bit higher oct in the summer months to help compensate for the Texas heat. No difference.
The only difference I have seen has been fairly recent, w/50k on the clock. This summer, in spite of it being hot as h*ll, I have seen a +/-3mpg increase while using the A/C that I never had before. I used to get 24-25mpg, but I have been getting 26-28mpg starting this year.
My best back and forth to work has been 30mpg w/A/C in the afternoon and none in the morning.
#28
As for Premium fuel, unless your engine is built to take advantage of the extra detonation resistance (i.e. high mechanical compression ratio and/or the ability to advance the ignition timing to keep the combustion wave at the ragged edge of insipient detonation) there is no physical possibility for Premium fuel to give you better mileage, and if anything, your mileage may actually go down.[/quote]
Shipo you could be right. I am not a car technical person. It had been my experience that with the use of both k&n and better gas will improve the mileage. However I will try on regular unleaded next tank instead of the Plus and see if there are diff. in the mileage
Shipo you could be right. I am not a car technical person. It had been my experience that with the use of both k&n and better gas will improve the mileage. However I will try on regular unleaded next tank instead of the Plus and see if there are diff. in the mileage
#30
I get much better mpg with the manual Mazda 3
I have a 2019 Mazda 3 with all the premium bells and whistles, sun roof (which I rarely use but it's nice), upscale radio with subwoofer, upscale seats and wheels). On one occasion (a recall) and one occasion (repair under warrantee), I was given the same Mazda 3 with an automatic as a loaner (actually it was the sedan and not the hatch I drive). I drove the loaner as conservatively as I could on the same roads to get the mpg average. I got 32 to 34 which is quite respectable IMHO. However, driving my own car with the 6 speed manual I average 42 and my wife who drives differently gets 38 to 39. In a competition with her to prove my skill at driving a stick for economy is better I got as high as 50 mpg but I must admit some of my skills were annoying to other drivers (we don't have much traffic around here though). If I drive the Mazda 3 manual in what I consider a perfectly normal way I get the same 39 mpg as my wife does, but no matter how much effort I put into it I could not get the automatic past 34 mpg and I tried very hard. What's up with this? I've heard modern automatics get the same mpg as sticks. In addition, the automatic "felt" slower, but to be honest, I really don't know if that's true. It just definitely felt that way.